The Shazamme Career Site Grader measures one thing classic SEO tools miss: whether your site is visible, credible and convertible across traditional search, AI answer engines (GEO/AEO) and the candidate journey. This page documents exactly how the score is produced — because a scoring standard should be transparent.
The engine adapts its pillars and weighting to what is being graded:
Each pillar is scored 0–100 from its own checks, then combined into the overall score using mode-specific weights. Recruitment mode, for example:
| Pillar | What it measures | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| SEO & Discoverability | Titles, meta, schema validity, sector pages, indexability | 22% |
| GEO & AI Visibility | AI crawler access, entity/authority, AEO readiness, crawlable content | 20% |
| Candidate Experience | Mobile, accessibility, apply flow, job search, speed | 22% |
| Employer Brand & Content | EVP, social proof, video, culture | 14% |
| Technical Performance | Core Web Vitals, Lighthouse, compression, caching | 13% |
| Conversion & Engagement | CTAs, job alerts, chat, sharing | 9% |
Within a pillar, every check carries its own point value; the pillar score is the points earned over points available, so adding checks automatically rebalances without distorting the weighting.
Generative AI is now an answer layer between candidates/clients and your site. We measure readiness for it directly:
robots.txt.sameAs links to Wikidata/LinkedIn/Crunchbase, consistent NAP, named people (E-E-A-T) and accreditations — how AI engines confirm who you are and whether to trust you.Where available, performance uses Google PageSpeed Insights — real Chrome-user field data (CrUX) for LCP, INP and CLS, plus a Lighthouse lab score from a fully-rendered test — not a single server-timing guess.
/job-results, /job-detail, etc.) and detect client-rendered job boards, so apply/search aren't falsely marked missing.